How did one book nearly destroy neural network research for an entire decade?
Two MIT legends published a mathematical proof that the perceptron couldn't solve basic problems - and funding evaporated overnight.
The answer
In 1969, Marvin Minsky and Seymour Papert published 'Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry,' a rigorous mathematical analysis proving that single-layer perceptrons could not compute certain functions, most notably the XOR (exclusive or) operation. They showed that a perceptron could only learn linearly separable patterns, a severe limitation. While they briefly acknowledged that multi-layer networks might overcome these limitations, the book's overall pessimistic tone convinced many researchers and funding agencies that neural networks were a dead end. Government funding for connectionist research dried up almost immediately, and neural network work entered a 'dark age' that lasted roughly from 1969 to 1982, until Hopfield networks and backpropagation revived interest.
Source: MIT Press
- perceptron
- minsky
- papert
- history
More from AI & Machine Learning
- What radical question did Alan Turing ask in 1950 that launched the entire field of artificial intelligence?
- Can a machine fool you into thinking it's human - and does that mean it's truly intelligent?
- What happened at a small Dartmouth workshop in 1956 that gave artificial intelligence its name?
- How did a 1958 invention called the Perceptron convince people that machines could learn like brains?
- Could a 1966 chatbot really make people believe they were talking to a therapist?
- What was the first robot that could 'reason' about its own actions?