Do AI models just need to be bigger, or is there a smarter way to scale?
The AI world split into two camps: those who said 'just make it bigger' and those who said 'make it better.'
The answer
The scaling laws debate intensified after Kaplan et al. at OpenAI published empirical findings in January 2020 showing that model performance improves predictably as a power law with model size, dataset size, and compute budget. This 'bigger is better' philosophy drove the creation of ever-larger models from GPT-3 to PaLM (540B parameters). However, the 2022 Chinchilla paper challenged this by showing most large models were significantly undertrained relative to their size. The debate continues today with some researchers pursuing efficiency through architectural innovations, while others argue that scale remains the primary driver of capability.
Source: arXiv
- scaling laws
- compute
- training efficiency
More from AI & Machine Learning
- What radical question did Alan Turing ask in 1950 that launched the entire field of artificial intelligence?
- Can a machine fool you into thinking it's human - and does that mean it's truly intelligent?
- What happened at a small Dartmouth workshop in 1956 that gave artificial intelligence its name?
- How did a 1958 invention called the Perceptron convince people that machines could learn like brains?
- Could a 1966 chatbot really make people believe they were talking to a therapist?
- What was the first robot that could 'reason' about its own actions?